Serum uric acid predicts therapeutic response to midodrine hydrochloride in children with vasovagal syncope: a pilot study.

Serum uric acid (UA) level has been proven to be related to several cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. In the present study, we examined if baseline serum UA level could predict the therapeutic efficacy of midodrine hydrochloride on vasovagal syncope (VVS) in children. The pediatric VVS patients who received midodrine hydrochloride from November 2008 to October 2022 were enrolled. After a median treatment duration of 3 months, the therapeutic effect was evaluated. According to the patients' responses to midodrine hydrochloride, which was determined by the recurrence of syncope, they were divided into effective and ineffective groups. The baseline variables were explored using univariable and multivariate logistic analysis. The predictive efficacy was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), precision-recall curve (PR), Hosmer-Lemeshow test, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Totally, 53 participants were included in the study. Among the 51 patients who were successfully followed up, 29 (56.9%) responded to midodrine hydrochloride (effective group), and the other 22 (43.1%) failed to respond to midodrine hydrochloride (ineffective group). The participants in effective group had lower baseline serum UA level than those in ineffective group (276.5 ± 73 µmol/L vs. 332.7 ± 56 µmol/L, p = 0.004). Multivariable logistic analysis showed that serum UA was associated with the therapeutic response (odds ratio (OR): 0.985, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.974-0.997, p = 0.01). ROC analysis indicated that using baseline serum UA < 299 µmol/L as a threshold value yielded a sensitivity of 77.3% and a specificity of 79.3% in predicting the treatment response to midodrine hydrochloride. The area under the PR curve was 0.833. Hosmer-Lemeshow test yielded a p value of 0.58, and calibration plot indicated that the model was well-fitted. DCA demonstrated that treatment decision depending on the baseline serum UA level resulted in a favorable net benefit.   Conclusion: This pilot study suggested that the baseline serum UA level could be taken as a predictor of therapeutic effect of midodrine hydrochloride on VVS in children. What is Known: • Empirical and unselected use of midodrine hydrochloride has an unfavorable therapeutic effect on VVS in children. Serum uric acid (UA) is closely linked to cardiovascular events. What is New: • A low baseline serum UA level successfully predicts the therapeutic effectiveness of midodrine hydrochloride on VVS in children.

Serotonin reuptake inhibition for the prevention of vasovagal syncope: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Vasovagal syncope is a common clinical condition that lacks effective medical therapies despite being associated with significant morbidity. Current guidelines suggest that serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors might suppress vasovagal syncope but supporting studies have been small and heterogenous. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors to prevent syncope in patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies. METHODS: Relevant randomized controlled trials were identified from the MEDLINE and Embase databases without language restriction from inception to August 2022, and ClinicalTrials.gov. All studies were conducted in clinical syncope populations and compared the benefit of serotonin versus placebo. Weighted relative risks were estimated using random effects meta-analysis techniques. RESULTS: Three studies (n = 204) met inclusion criteria. Patients were 42 ± 13 years of age and 51% female. Serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors were found to substantially reduce the likelihood of a patient having at least one recurrence of vasovagal syncope [relative risk (RR) 0.34 (0.20-0.60), p < 0.01] with minimal between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, p = 0.67). Serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors in two reports provided significant protection against clinical presyncope [RR 0.43 (0.24-0.77), p < 0.01], with minimal between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, p = 0.80). CONCLUSIONS: Serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors may be effective in preventing syncope induced by head-up tilt testing and in syncope in the community in randomized, double-blinded clinical trials.

The Seventh Prevention of Syncope Trial (POST VII)-A randomized clinical trial of atomoxetine for the prevention of vasovagal syncope: Rationale and study design.

BACKGROUND: Vasovagal syncope (VVS) is common, recurs, and is associated with markedly reduced quality of life, anxiety, and frequent injuries. The few pharmacological therapies for VVS proven to have a moderate benefit in reducing recurrences are limited to patients without coexisting conditions such as hypertension or heart failure. Although there is some data to suggest Atomoxetine, a norepinephrine reuptake transport inhibitor (NET), may be a promising treatment option, an adequately powered randomized placebo-controlled trial is needed. STUDY DESIGN: POST VII is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study that will randomize 180 patients with VVS and at least 2 syncopal spells in the preceding year to a target daily dose of atomoxetine 80 mg daily or to a matching placebo, with an observation period of 6 months in each phase and with a 1-week washout period between phases. The primary end point will be the proportion of patients with at least one syncope recurrence in each arm analyzed with an intention-to-treat approach. The secondary end points include total syncope burden, quality of life, cost, and cost-effectiveness. POWER CALCULATIONS: Assuming a 33% relative risk reduction in syncope recurrence with atomoxetine, and a dropout rate of 16%, the enrollment of 180 patients will give an 85% power of reaching a positive conclusion about atomoxetine, with P = .05. CONCLUSIONS: This will be the first adequately powered trial to determine whether atomoxetine is effective in preventing VVS. If proven effective, atomoxetine might become the first-line pharmacological treatment for recurrent VVS.

Pharmacologic prevention of recurrent vasovagal syncope: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Vasovagal syncope (VVS) is a transient loss of consciousness that currently imposes a high burden on health care systems with limited evidence of the comparative efficacy of available pharmacologic interventions. This study aims to compare all pharmacologic therapies suggested in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) through systematic review and network meta-analysis. A systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify RCTs evaluating pharmacologic therapies for patients with VVS. The primary outcome was spontaneous VVS recurrence. The secondary outcome was a positive head-up tilt test (HUTT) after receiving intervention, regarded as a lower level of evidence. Pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using random-effect network meta-analysis. Pairwise meta-analysis for comparison with placebo was also performed when applicable. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve analysis was conducted to rank the treatments for each outcome. Twenty-eight studies with 1744 patients allocated to different medications or placebo were included. Network meta-analysis of the reduction in the primary outcome showed efficacy for midodrine (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.35-0.85) and fluoxetine (especially in patients with concomitant anxiety) (RR 0.36; 95% CI 0.16-0.84). In addition, midodrine and atomoxetine were superior to other treatment options, considering positive HUTT (RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.23-0.59; and RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.28-0.86, respectively). Overall, midodrine was the only agent shown to reduce spontaneous syncopal events. Fluoxetine also seems to be beneficial but should be studied further in RCTs. Our network meta-analysis did not find evidence of the efficacy of any other medication.

Safety, Pharmacokinetic, and Pharmacodynamic Study of a Sublingual Formula for the Treatment of Vasovagal Syncope.

BACKGROUND: Vasovagal syncope is a common cause of syncope which, if recurrent, can have multiple negative consequences such as injury and occupational disability. Various medications can be used to decrease the recurrence of vasovagal syncope but there are no drugs that can be used by patients to interrupt a perceived vasovagal episode. METHODS: A phase I study was performed to evaluate the tolerability and safety of a gel formulation containing capsaicin (1 mg), phenylephrine HCL (PE) and caffeine citrate (200 mg) (CPC) in normal adult volunteers. Secondary objectives were to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the CPC formulation and the highest dose of PE needed to achieve a target increase in systolic BP of at least 40 mmHg. After receiving the first dose, a second dose of the CPC mixture was administered at 2 h. Suboptimal changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP) were noted at PE doses of 0.6, 1.2, and 1.8 mg, therefore a second cohort was studied at PE doses of 10, 20, and 30 mg. Blood samples were collected in rapid sequence and were assayed for all three drugs. RESULTS: A total of 17 subjects received the drug with no serious adverse effects reported. All doses were well tolerated, although the capsaicin content usually caused expected temporary oral and gastric discomfort. One subject did not complete the study because of a vasovagal reaction that was associated with the frequent blood sampling. There was a 5-25 min lag in the appearance of measurable blood concentrations of capsaicin and phenylephrine. Most subjects had baseline caffeine concentrations from dietary use, with a gradual increase noted after 15 min consistent with GI absorption. Although the intended criterion of a 40 mmHg increase in SBP was not reached, a clinically significant increase in BP for at least 15 min was noted in the six subjects who received the highest dose of PE (30 mg), with a gradual decline over the next 2 h. CONCLUSION: The ternary mixture of capsaicin, phenylephrine, and caffeine was well tolerated when administered as two sublingual/oral doses over a 2-h period.

Midodrine for the prevention of vasovagal syncope: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: Vasovagal syncope (VVS) is a common clinical condition that lacks effective medical therapies despite being associated with significant morbidity. Current guidelines suggest that midodrine, a prodrug for an α1-adrenergic receptor agonist, might suppress VVS but supporting studies have utilized heterogeneous methods and yielded inconsistent results. To evaluate the efficacy of midodrine to prevent syncope in patients with recurrent VVS by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies. METHODS AND RESULTS: Relevant randomized controlled trials were identified from the MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases without language restriction from inception to June 2021. All studies were conducted in clinical syncope populations and compared the benefit of midodrine vs. placebo or non-pharmacological standard care. Weighted relative risks (RRs) were estimated using random effects meta-analysis techniques. Seven studies (n = 315) met inclusion criteria. Patients were 33 ± 17 years of age and 31% male. Midodrine was found to substantially reduce the likelihood of positive head-up-tilt (HUT) test outcomes [RR = 0.37 (0.23-0.59), P < 0.001]. In contrast, the pooled results of single- and double-blind clinical trials (I2 = 54%) suggested a more modest benefit from midodrine for the prevention of clinical syncope [RR = 0.51 (0.33-0.79), P = 0.003]. The two rigorous double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials included 179 VVS patients with minimal between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 0%) and reported a risk reduction with midodrine [RR = 0.71 (0.53-0.95), P = 0.02]. CONCLUSIONS: Midodrine is effective in preventing syncope induced by HUT testing and less, but still significant, RR reduction in randomized, double-blinded clinical trials.

Salt supplementation in the management of orthostatic intolerance: Vasovagal syncope and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome.

Salt supplementation is a common non-pharmacological approach to the management of recurrent orthostatic syncope or presyncope, particularly for patients with vasovagal syncope (VVS) or postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), although there is limited consensus on the optimal dosage, formulation and duration of treatment. Accordingly, we reviewed the evidence for the use of salt supplementation to reduce susceptibility to syncope or presyncope in patients with VVS and POTS. We found that short-term (~3 months) salt supplementation improves susceptibility to VVS and associated symptoms, with little effect on supine blood pressure. In patients with VVS, salt supplementation is associated with increases in plasma volume, and an increase in the time taken to provoke a syncopal event during orthostatic tolerance testing, with smaller orthostatic heart rate increases, enhanced peripheral vascular responses to orthostatic stress, and improved cerebral autoregulation. Responses were most pronounced in those with a baseline sodium excretion <170 mmol/day. Salt supplementation also improved symptoms, plasma volume, and orthostatic responses in patients with POTS. Salt supplementation should be considered for individuals with recurrent and troublesome episodes of VVS or POTS without cardiovascular comorbidities, particularly if their typical urinary sodium excretion is low, and their supine blood pressure is not elevated. The efficacy of the response, in terms of the improvement in subjective and objective markers of orthostatic intolerance, and any potential deleterious effect on supine blood pressure, should be routinely monitored in individuals on high salt regimes.

Comparison of Outcomes with Midodrine and Fludrocortisone for Objective Recurrence in Treating Syncope (COMFORTS trial): Rationale and design for a multi-center randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The cornerstone of the treatment of vasovagal syncope (VVS) is lifestyle modifications; however, some patients incur life-disturbing attacks despite compliance with these treatments which underscores the importance of pharmacological interventions. METHODS: In this open-label multi-center randomized controlled trial, we are going to randomize 1375 patients with VVS who had ≥2 syncopal episodes in the last year into three parallel arms with a 2:2:1 ratio to receive midodrine, fludrocortisone, or no medication. All patients will be recommended to drink 2 to 3 liters of fluids per day, consume 10 grams of NaCl per day, and practice counter-pressure maneuvers. In medication arms, patients will start on 5 mg of midodrine TDS or 0.05 mg of fludrocortisone BD. After one week the dosage will be up-titrated to midodrine 30 mg/day and fludrocortisone 0.2 mg/day. Patient tolerance will be the principal guide to dosage adjustments. We will follow-up the patients on 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after randomization. The primary outcome is the time to first syncopal episode. Secondary outcomes include the recurrence rate of VVS, time interval between first and second episodes, changes in quality of life (QoL), and major and minor adverse drug reactions. QoL will be examined by the 36-Item Short Form Survey questionnaire at enrollment and 12 months after randomization. CONCLUSION: The COMFORTS trial is the first study that aims to make a head-to-head comparison between midodrine and fludrocortisone, against a background of lifestyle modifications for preventing recurrences of VVS and improving QoL in patients with VVS.

Midodrine treatment in children with recurrent vasovagal syncope.

BACKGROUND: Vasovagal syncope is the most common cause of syncope in childhood and its treatment is not at a satisfactory level yet. We aimed to investigate patients who were diagnosed with vasovagal syncope, did not benefit from conventional treatment, received midodrine treatment, and to evaluate their response to midodrine treatment. METHODS: Files of 24 patients who were diagnosed with recurrent vasovagal syncope, did not benefit from non-pharmacological treatments, and received midodrine treatment during June 2017-October 2019 were retrospectively analysed. RESULTS: In total, 24 patients received a treatment dose of midodrine at 5 mg/day (2.5 mg BID) included in the study. The mean number of syncope was 5.75 ± 2.67 prior to treatment. Following treatment, the mean number of syncope was 0.42 ± 0.89. It was observed that syncope episodes did not recur in 17 patients, but it recurred in 4 out of 7 patients in the first 3 months of the treatment and did not recur in the following months. The episodes improved in two patients with an increase in the treatment dose, but the syncope episodes continued in only one patient. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that midodrine treatment was effective and safe in adolescents with recurrent vasovagal syncope.

Duration of treatment with oral rehydration salts for vasovagal syncope in children and adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Oral rehydration salt (ORS) is a first-line medication for vasovagal syncope (VVS) in children and adolescents. We retrospectively investigated the treatment with ORS-I (Na 90 mmol/L) for VVS in children and adolescents to define appropriate duration of treatment. METHODS: All patients with a diagnosis of VVS, based on the first head-up tilt test (HUTT) response, and who accepted ORS-I treatment were enrolled. ORS was stopped when the HUTT response turned negative. Patients were followed for six months after cessation of ORS treatment. RESULTS: The study group included 129 patients (57 male, 72 female; mean age, 11.8 ± 2.0 years, age range, 7.0- 17.0 years). Median duration of VVS was 4 months (range, 1 week to > 10 years). The number of syncope ranged from 2 times to > 20 times. Mean follow-up time was 27.8 ± 6.9 weeks (range, 26-33 weeks). It took to 2~13 weeks for HUTT response to turn negative, with an average time of 8.4 weeks (95% confidence interval, 6.89~9.84 weeks). There was no statistical difference for the time to negative HUTT response according to age groups ( < 12-year-old vs. ≥12-year-old), syncope type (vasodepressor vs. mixed), and the syncope frequency. No patient experienced syncope after cessation of ORS treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that ORS-I is an effective measure to treat children and adolescents with VVS. We recommend a treatment course of 2 months.

Plasma adenosine and neurally mediated syncope: ready for clinical use.

Either central or peripheral baroreceptor reflex abnormalities and/or alterations in neurohumoral mechanisms play a pivotal role in the genesis of neurally mediated syncope. Thus, improving our knowledge of the biochemical mechanisms underlying specific forms of neurally mediated syncope (more properly termed 'neurohumoral syncope') might allow the development of new therapies that are effective in this specific subgroup. A low-adenosine phenotype of neurohumoral syncope has recently been identified. Patients who suffer syncope without prodromes and have a normal heart display a purinergic profile which is the opposite of that observed in vasovagal syncope patients and is characterized by very low-adenosine plasma level values, low expression of A2A receptors and the predominance of the TC variant in the single nucleotide c.1364 C>T polymorphism of the A2A receptor gene. The typical mechanism of syncope is an idiopathic paroxysmal atrioventricular block or sinus bradycardia, most often followed by sinus arrest. Since patients with low plasma adenosine levels are highly susceptible to endogenous adenosine, chronic treatment of these patients with theophylline, a non-selective adenosine receptor antagonist, is expected to prevent syncopal recurrences. This hypothesis is supported by results from series of cases and from observational controlled studies.

Pharmacological norepinephrine transporter inhibition for the prevention of vasovagal syncope in young and adult subjects: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Vasovagal syncope (VVS) significantly reduces quality of life, yet lacks effective medical therapies. Pharmacological norepinephrine transporter (NET) inhibition increases synaptic norepinephrine reuptake, which may be able to prevent hypotension, bradycardia, and syncope. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the ability of 3 NET inhibitors-reboxetine, sibutramine, and atomoxetine-to prevent head-up tilt-induced vasovagal outcomes in healthy participants and patients with VVS. METHODS: Relevant studies were identified from Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Excerpta Medica Database, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature without language restriction from database inception to August 2019. All randomized controlled trials comparing the benefit of a NET inhibitor vs placebo in adult populations were selected for review and meta-analysis. RESULTS: Four studies (101 participants) met inclusion criteria. The mean study size was 25 (range 11-56) participants. NET inhibition reduced the likelihood of vasovagal reactions marked by hypotension and bradycardia in healthy participants during head-up tilt testing (relative risk 0.15; 95% confidence interval 0.04-0.52; P = .003). This relative risk reduction also occurred in patients with VVS during head-up tilt when given atomoxetine (relative risk 0.49; 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.86; P = .01). This was achieved through heart rate compensation with NET inhibition toward the end of tilt testing (106 ± 32 beats/min vs 60 ± 22 beats/min; P < .001), which in turn preserved cardiac output and mean arterial pressure (71 ± 20 mm Hg vs 43 ± 13 mm Hg; P < .001) in the absence of significantly increased systemic vascular resistance. CONCLUSION: NET inhibition prevents severe vasovagal reactions and syncope induced by head-up tilt testing in both healthy participants and patients with VVS. Pharmacological NET inhibition is a promising potential treatment of recurrent syncope.

Body mass index is a promising predictor of response to oral rehydration saline in children with vasovagal syncope.

BACKGROUND: Vasovagal syncope (VVS) greatly impairs quality of life. The therapeutic efficacy of oral rehydration saline (ORS) for unselected VVS patients is not satisfactory due to the diverse mechanisms of the disease. Body mass index (BMI) was demonstrated to reflect blood volume to a certain extent. Therefore, the present study explored the capability of BMI to predict the therapeutic response of children with VVS to ORS treatment. METHODS: Seventy-four children with VVS who visited the Syncope Unit of Pediatrics at Peking University First Hospital from November 2010 to June 2019 receiving ORS treatment were enrolled for this retrospective case-control study. A comparison of demographic, clinical, and hemodynamic characteristics was performed between responders and non-responders. The correlation between baseline BMI and response time was analyzed. To determine the value of baseline BMI in predicting the therapeutic efficacy of ORS in children with VVS, a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed. RESULTS: Fifty-two children were identified as responders, and the remaining 22 children were identified as non-responders. The baseline BMI of the responders was much lower than that of the non-responders (16.4 [15.5, 17.8] kg/m2vs. 20.7 ±e6 kg/m2, P < 0.001), and baseline BMI was positively correlated with response time in the head-up tilt test after adjusting for sex (r = 0.256, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.067-0.439, P = 0.029). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of baseline BMI was 0.818 (95% CI: 0.704-0.932, P < 0.001), and an optimal cut-off value of 18.9 kg/m2 yielded a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 73% to predict the efficacy of ORS in VVS. CONCLUSION: Prior to treatment, baseline BMI is a promising predictor of response to ORS in children with VVS.

Body mass index is a promising predictor of response to oral rehydration saline in children with vasovagal syncope / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

BACKGROUND@#Vasovagal syncope (VVS) greatly impairs quality of life. The therapeutic efficacy of oral rehydration saline (ORS) for unselected VVS patients is not satisfactory due to the diverse mechanisms of the disease. Body mass index (BMI) was demonstrated to reflect blood volume to a certain extent. Therefore, the present study explored the capability of BMI to predict the therapeutic response of children with VVS to ORS treatment.@*METHODS@#Seventy-four children with VVS who visited the Syncope Unit of Pediatrics at Peking University First Hospital from November 2010 to June 2019 receiving ORS treatment were enrolled for this retrospective case-control study. A comparison of demographic, clinical, and hemodynamic characteristics was performed between responders and non-responders. The correlation between baseline BMI and response time was analyzed. To determine the value of baseline BMI in predicting the therapeutic efficacy of ORS in children with VVS, a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed.@*RESULTS@#Fifty-two children were identified as responders, and the remaining 22 children were identified as non-responders. The baseline BMI of the responders was much lower than that of the non-responders (16.4 [15.5, 17.8] kg/m2vs. 20.7 ±e6 kg/m2, P < 0.001), and baseline BMI was positively correlated with response time in the head-up tilt test after adjusting for sex (r = 0.256, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.067-0.439, P = 0.029). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of baseline BMI was 0.818 (95% CI: 0.704-0.932, P < 0.001), and an optimal cut-off value of 18.9 kg/m2 yielded a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 73% to predict the efficacy of ORS in VVS.@*CONCLUSION@#Prior to treatment, baseline BMI is a promising predictor of response to ORS in children with VVS.

Quality of life improves in vasovagal syncope patients after clinical trial enrollment regardless of fainting in follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Frequent syncope is linked to poorer health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Recurrent syncope has been observed to reduce in all groups after seeing a syncope expert and enrolling in a clinical trial. It is unknown if HRQoL improves with this reduction in syncope recurrence. OBJECTIVES: We examined the change in HRQoL over time in vasovagal syncope (VVS) patients seen by a syncope expert and enrolled in a trial. We also explored whether change differed with treatment or the frequency of fainting during follow up. METHODS: The Short Form Health Survey (SF36) was completed at baseline (BL), 6 m, and 12 m post-enrollment by VVS patients in the 1st and 2nd Prevention of Syncope Trials, which were multi-centered, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of metoprolol (POST) and fludrocortisone (POST2). Differences in HRQoL at BL, 6 m, and 12 m were analyzed and compared by faints in follow-up and randomization group. RESULTS: Complete study data were available for 143 VVS patients (40 ±â€¯17 years, 62% F). Over 12 months, patients reported improvement in all SF36 dimensions except for bodily pain. Post hoc analyses indicated that differences first occurred between BL and 6 m for all but general health. Fainting in follow-up or drug randomization group did not diminish the improvements. The baseline syncope burden was not different whether patients' HRQoL improved or not. CONCLUSION: HRQoL of VVS patients improves over time after enrolling in a clinical trial, even with recurrent faints or randomization to placebo. Improvements may result from alternative factors, such as interaction with experts or patient adjustment.

Twenty-four-hour urine NE level as a predictor of the therapeutic response to metoprolol in children with recurrent vasovagal syncope.

BACKGROUND: Vasovagal syncope (VVS) is a heterogeneous disorder that creates challenges for treatment. Metoprolol is an important therapeutic option for children with VVS. AIMS: The study examined the predictive value of 24-h urine norepinephrine (NE) levels in the assessment of the therapeutic efficacy of metoprolol for recurrent VVS in children. METHODS: Thirty-eight children with recurrent VVS and 20 healthy children were enrolled in our study. Twenty-four-hour urine NE levels were measured by LC-MS-MS. VVS children were diagnosed by BHUTT and/or SNHUTT, and received metoprolol treatment for 3 months. Symptom scoring was utilized to evaluate the therapeutic effect. A ROC curve was used to investigate the predictive value of 24-h urine norepinephrine levels. RESULTS: There exists significant correlation between 24-h urine NE levels and supine systolic and diastolic blood pressures. The 24-h urine NE levels of responders (40.75 ± 12.86 µg/24 h) were higher than those of nonresponders (21.48 ± 6.49 µg/24 h), and there was a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.001). A ROC curve of the predictive value of 24 h urine NE levels revealed that the area under the curve was 0.926. A cutoff value for 24-h urine NE level of 34.84 µg/24 h produced both high sensitivity (70%) and specificity (100%) in predicting the efficacy of metoprolol therapy for VVS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with high 24-h urine NE levels have higher supine systolic and diastolic pressures and more effective responses to metoprolol. A 24-h urine norepinephrine level of > 34.84 µg/24 h was an indicator of the effectiveness of metoprolol therapy for VVS in children.

Effect of Citalopram for the Treatment of Neurocardiogenic Syncope.

BACKGROUND: Neurocardiogenic syncope (NCS) is a common form of syncope. Although selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and other medications have been used to treat NCS with variable success, there is no consensus regarding a first-line therapy. STUDY QUESTION: To assess the effects of citalopram in NCS and to examine the effect of diagnostic use of the head-up tilt table (HUTT) versus empirical diagnosis on patient outcome. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case series of 1000 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with NCS and treated with citalopram. MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: The primary outcome measure was well-being score (WS) recorded at each outpatient visit. RESULTS: After excluding patients who had other comorbidities, were taking daily medication, or did not attend a follow-up visit within 1 month after treatment initiation, data from 186 patients were included. Thirty-five patients were diagnosed empirically, and 151 patients were diagnosed with the HUTT. All 186 patients were followed up within 1 month (early follow-up); of these, 92 patients attended a second follow-up after 1 month (late follow-up). The early follow-up group showed a significant improvement in mean WS (7.35 vs. 4.46, P < 0.001) and only 5 patients discontinued therapy because of intolerability. The late follow-up group also showed significant improvements in mean WS at the early follow-up (7.42 vs. 4.43, P < 0.001) and late follow-up (7.42 vs. 4.26, P < 0.001). Of 186 patients who were treated with citalopram, only 11 reported the development of undesirable side effects. There was no significant difference in the outcome of patients who were diagnosed empirically versus those who were diagnosed with the HUTT. CONCLUSIONS: Citalopram seems to have desirable effects on NCS and patient well-being. Diagnostic use of the HUTT is useful for confirming diagnoses of NCS but is not likely to improve patient outcome.

Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Fractional Shortening are Useful for the Prediction of the Therapeutic Response to Metoprolol in Children with Vasovagal Syncope.

The objective of this manuscript was to explore if left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular fractional shortening (LVFS) could predict the efficacy of metoprolol therapy on vasovagal syncope (VVS) in children. Forty-nine children, including 30 with VVS and 19 gender- and age-matched healthy controls, were included in the study. Metoprolol was prescribed to the VVS subjects. The clinical data were obtained during follow-up at 2 and 6 months. The results showed that LVEF and LVFS of responders were significantly higher than those of non-responders both at the 2-month follow-up (LVEF: 72.5 ± 3.2% vs. 64.6 ± 3.4%; LVFS: 40.9 ± 2.3% vs. 34.9 ± 2.9%), and at the 6-month follow-up (LVEF: 72.8 ± 2.8% vs. 65.5 ± 4.6%; LVFS: 41.1 ± 1.9% vs. 35.8 ± 3.6%). The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis demonstrated that 70.5% as a cutoff value of baseline LVEF yielded a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 100% in predicting the therapeutic effectiveness of metoprolol at 2 months. For baseline LVFS, 38.5% as a cutoff value yielded a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 90%. At the 6-month follow-up, the ROC analysis demonstrated that 70.5% as a cutoff value of baseline LVEF yielded a sensitivity of 81.3% and a specificity of 88.9% in the prediction of metoprolol efficacy. For baseline LVFS, 37.5% as a cutoff value yielded a sensitivity of 93.8% and a specificity of 66.7%. In conclusion, baseline LVEF and LVFS might be useful predictors of the efficacy of ß-blocker therapy on VVS in children.

Pharmacological Treatment of Vagal Hyperactivity, a Rare but Potentially Fatal Cause of Sudden Cardiac Death.

Vasovagal reaction, resulting in bradycardia and/or hypotension in response to a number of stimuli, is usually self-limiting, but potentially life-threatening exceptions have been described. Pharmacological treatment of proven efficacy is still lacking and the administered compounds are often chosen on the basis of either case reports or outdated small studies with a short-term follow up. In refractory cases, pacemaker implantation may be considered, although no responder patients represent a severe challenge for clinicians. The aim of this review is to examine the state of the art about this controversial issue.